<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matt Inertia &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattinertia.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattinertia.com</link>
	<description>Freelance Online Marketer &#38; SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Clever is Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.mattinertia.com/how-clever-is-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattinertia.com/how-clever-is-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a post i dropped at Seoers.org on the subject of how clever Google really is. If you believe some people they see all, know all. If you believe others they don’t know diddly squat about most things. When you look at the SERPs you can certainly see why as there are plenty of examples [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a post i <a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/google/how-clever-is-google/" target="_blank">dropped at Seoers.org</a> on the subject of how clever Google really is. If you believe some people they see all, know all. If you believe others they don’t know diddly squat about most things. When you look at the <acronym title="Search Engine Result Pages">SERPs</acronym> you can certainly see why as there are plenty of examples where spam sites are kicking arse.<br />
The reason I asked this question was in response to this <a href="http://searchengineland.com/do-links-from-expired-domains-count-with-google-17811" target="_blank">post from Danny Sullivan</a> about helping your SEO efforts by buying up old domains. I don’t agree with some of the points he makes and I think most of it&#8217;s a case of hear say and speculation but it did prompt me to ask the question; how clever is Google really?<span id="more-181"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>We all know the Google guidelines and the &#8220;dos and don’ts&#8221; of SEO and on-line marketing. But is Google actually as clever as it says at spotting violations or is it a case of smoke and mirrors? There are numerous examples of sites ranking that break these guidelines and there are also plenty of contradictions between SEOs ideas about how to gain top rankings.</p>
<p>Here it the fundamental question which all SEOs need to consider&#8230;.<br />
Q. How clever is Google?<br />
A. Thick as pig sh*t<br />
A. Not clever at all and what they say and recommend isn’t usually correct or worth considering.<br />
A. They are more or less spot on with what they say and how they act.<br />
A. They are cleverer than they make out but like to keep this from us.<br />
A. They are light years beyond the public perception.</p>
<p>The reason i ask is based on the conflicting advice I hear from SEOs all the time. One SEO does not recommend something but another does and they generally fall into three categories white, grey and black. The white hat guys would call the black hat guys fools and vice versa.</p></blockquote>
<p>Answers on a post card&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattinertia.com/how-clever-is-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1092</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travelling SEOs &#8211; for SEOs of no fixed abode</title>
		<link>http://www.mattinertia.com/travelling-seos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattinertia.com/travelling-seos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travelling Seos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a little something I set-up today, sort of like an answer to an apparent demand but also as a training exercise in using Ning. Here&#8217;s the wiki explanation of Ning. So for my first experiment with setting up a social network using Ning I&#8217;d like to introduce Travelling SEOs!!! The main idea came from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a little something I set-up today, sort of like an answer to an apparent demand but also as a training exercise in using Ning. Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ning">wiki explanation of Ning</a>. So for my first experiment with setting up a social network using Ning I&#8217;d like to introduce <a href="http://travellingseos.ning.com/">Travelling SEOs</a>!!! The main idea came from a <a href="http://www.webproworld.com/internet-industry/77645-shall-i-become-travelling-search-engine-optimization-too-tricky.html">thread at WPW</a> concerning the implication of conducting SEO whilst on the road, abroad or locally. I was surprised by the feedback the thread received and came to the conclusion that a Ning group could be quite doable with that level of interest.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-144" title="travelling-seos" src="http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/travelling-seos.jpg" alt="travelling-seos" width="535" height="142" /></p>
<p><span id="more-142"></span>Here&#8217;s a few tips garnered from my thread at WPW:</p>
<ul>
<li>Get an unlocked GSM phone from Ebay&#8230; much cheaper than through a regular mobile service vendor, plus no contracts to sign and you can change SIM cards very cheaply from country to country.</li>
<li>Bring your laptop, make sure it has WI-FI capability.</li>
<li>Try to get an all-encompassing warranty for the laptop in case it breaks down on you somewhere on the road (*I got a special warranty from Future Shop in Canada that allows me to have my Sony VAIO laptop replaced hassle free, and on the spot, at ANY Sony store worldwide).</li>
<li>Bring at least 2 credit cards for wi-fi time etc. if applicable</li>
<li>Buy the Pacsafe anti-theft laptop bag</li>
<li>Buy a retractable travel lock or 3</li>
<li>Bring an 8GB removable USB memory stick or 3 (*laptops get stolen and broken frequently when travelling internationally&#8230; use the memory stick to back up all your data on a regular basis&#8230; plus they are small, light, portable and customs agents do not look at them normally) and you can use them in virtually any internet cafe if a crisis arises while you are travelling.</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve had bags stolen when travelling/working abroad before&#8230; ALWAYS use the retractable lock to secure your laptop on trains, hotel rooms, cafes&#8230; everywhere.<br />
Remember this&#8230; theft of bags abroad etc. is normally much more stealth and advanced than we see in North America&#8230; expect the unexpected at all times and never take your eyes off your valuables.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll also need to get a special program to secure your WI-FI transmissions&#8230; Jwire offers a WI-FI security software for $25.00 if I remember correctly.</li>
<li>Do not go into isolated/remote areas with no internet access or cell phone signal (obviously).</li>
<li>Always keep in mind the time zone differences when travelling abroad.</li>
<li>The key issue is whether you can maintain client relationships whilst on the move.</li>
</ul>
<p>Most of these tips were from <a href="http://www.webproworld.com/members/rcmedia.html" target="_blank">rcmedia</a> so thanks for that!</p>
<p>There was also a great link from CBOSLeeds to a post he did with loads more great advice: <a href="http://www.yousaytoo.com/cbosleeds/how-to-make-money-on-the-internet-without-being-a-couch-potato/23295" target="_blank">How to make money on the internet without being a couch potato.</a></p>
<p>So why not get involved with the movement!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattinertia.com/travelling-seos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5131</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Links and Traffic with Minisites</title>
		<link>http://www.mattinertia.com/building-links-with-minisites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattinertia.com/building-links-with-minisites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a comment in reply to my keyword research and optimisation post. The comment raised some interesting points about building links and traffic with minisites. I felt it deserved it&#8217;s own post. Something which I’ve begun to look at lately is the concept of creating mini satellite sites on behalf of clients, who don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a comment in reply to my <a href="http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/keyword-research-optimisation-techniques/" target="_blank">keyword research and optimisation post</a>. The comment raised some interesting points about building links and traffic with minisites. I felt it deserved it&#8217;s own post.<span id="more-128"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Something which I’ve begun to look at lately is the concept of creating mini satellite sites on behalf of clients, who don’t always have a large website.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ispywithmy.com/"></a></p>
<p>Let’s say for example, a hotel on the English Riviera in south Devon. They currently have a static 8 page website, with no new content coming onto that site.</p>
<p>Of course, each page of their current site is already optimised, hopefully, for a set number of keywords and long tailed keywords too, if they know anything about search engine optimisation. The trouble is often, that they are loathe to changing out these keywords and their respective content, for fear that their competition will overtake them in the search engine rankings and one can certainly empathise with this well founded fear of theirs.</p>
<p>My suggestion therefore is to create a number of satellite minisites for them, the ones I use are based on a WordPress blog theme. Each satellite minisite is targeted for no more than four long tailed keywords. The content I write myself of course paying particular attention to these keywords.</p>
<p>At the bottom of the content is a direct link to their main website, thereby the satellite minisites act as a funnel, driving the traffic from the satellite sites to the main website of the hotel or other business in question.</p>
<p>The rest of the pages on the satellite minisite are kept fully up to date with RSS aggregator feeds, the actual text residing in shadow boxes, so that it appears to Google that the satellite sites are indeed, WordPress blogs, which of course Google loves and ranks well.</p>
<p>This method increases the chances considerably of sending to the main website, plenty of new traffic based on the extra targeted four long tailed keywords. Typically, I’ll create about 10 satellite minisites which opens up the business to use an extra 40 long tailed keywords. And the original website of course, stays intact relieving the client of any fear of losing rank.</p>
<p>Hope all is well in your part of the world.</p>
<p>All the best!</p>
<p>Mark &#8211; <a href="http://www.ispywithmy.com/">http://www.iSpyWithMy.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>You bring up some interesting points. There are two schools of thought regarding minisites. Some people would suggest that you keep everything on one site and ethically this makes sense. In the example you provide another option would be to build extra pages for the client&#8217;s main site. That way you save on domain registration, hosting and you only have to spend time marketing one domain.</p>
<p>But, building extra sites can be a good way to generate links. For example, a lot of my clients have similar areas of business so we create industry theme blogs, for free, on wordpress (any other free blog platform would do). We populate these blogs with good quality industry related news, reviews etc. But we always try to make these blogs decent quality so they will attract natural links and interest. The blogs build PR and we have control of linking to whoever we want from them.  The advantage of doing it this way is you don&#8217;t have to reserve the site(s) purely for one client and any further links in that area are easily created. Happy days!</p>
<blockquote><p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ispywithmy.com/"></a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattinertia.com/building-links-with-minisites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1208</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Research &amp; Optimisation Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.mattinertia.com/keyword-research-optimisation-techniques/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattinertia.com/keyword-research-optimisation-techniques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217; some quotes from a thread discussion keyword research over at SEOers.org that I thought people might find interesting. Ill be posting more about keyword research in the coming weeks. The thread is focusing on how I go about deciding levels of competition for different keywords and which ones I target first: When finding out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-88" title="4823934thl" src="http://mattinertia.bingomatchup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/4823934thl.jpg" alt="4823934thl" width="180" height="120" />Here&#8217; some quotes from a thread discussion keyword research over at <a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/" target="_blank">SEOers.org</a> that I thought people might find interesting. Ill be posting more about keyword research in the coming weeks.</p>
<p>The thread is focusing on how I go about deciding levels of competition for different keywords and which ones I target first:<span id="more-84"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>When finding out levels of competition i use the allinurl:&#8221;keyword&#8221;, allinchor:&#8221;keyword&#8221; and allintitle:&#8221;keyword&#8221; searches. Doing all these will give you a better idea of what you&#8217;re up against. I don&#8217;t usually try and calculate the amount of traffic a keyword is going to provide and just go for the ones that i know are going to bring relevant visitors. Remember quality of visitors is the most important factor to think about.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57663/#msg57663" target="_blank">www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57663/#msg57663</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217; some info on how I come up with the original set of keywords:</p>
<blockquote><p>I use suggestions from the client, wordtracker, googles keyword tool, observations of the serps and personal intuition to come up with a list which may contain hundreds of keywords. But every keyword on the list will be relevant and a potential converter. I analyse the numbers from wordtracker and use the various google allin:&#8221;keyword&#8221; searches to get an idea of competition. The number of returned pages for standard google searches means very little. A low amount of returned pages can be just as competitive as a high number, it all depends on the quality of the top sites. I lay all this down on a spreadsheet and once all the data is in place its easy to figure out the easy keywords and the ones that will require more work.</p>
<p>Just an after thought&#8230; Once the above part is done Ill match up the keyword(s) with the urls of the site I&#8217;m working on, with the tougher keyword(s) assigned to the more prominent pages &#8211; golden keyword(s) on the home page! If its a new build then these keywords are implemented in the site from the start. If it&#8217;s an existing site then you have to do several things&#8230; figure out if they are already ranking somewhere for the keyword and what page (google often gets it wrong so you may have sort that out), do what you can to improve it and so on&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57909/#msg57909" target="_blank">http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57909/#msg57909</a></p>
<p>But one of the most important factors in figuring out which keywords will work is experience, this could be experience in anything from whether client&#8217;s payment warrants the time required to achieve what they want or if you already have a good idea what a site could be capable of. There are many factors which just become second nature and are born from an understand what you a, a client and a site can do:</p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t throw any keyword away due to the levels of competition or the research I&#8217;ve done on the SERPs. All of my clients have &#8220;golden keywords&#8221; which are bound to have high levels of competition. They get moved to the top of my keyword list and become long term strategies. The ones where my allin searches have revealed weaknesses become the short term goals. If you find there are no pages returned for &#8220;allinurl&#8221; searches then you usually find there are low levels of competition for allintitle and allinanchor. The three figures that you get from that research become a great indication of how well all the competing sites have been optimised.</p>
<p>So my <strong>competition </strong>research never results in me dropping keywords, just which ones i target first. <strong>It&#8217;s worth noting that how long it will take to achieve top rankings for keywords should be discussed with the client from the start. If your client isn&#8217;t paying for a lot of your time then it&#8217;s going to take longer to accomplish positions for their bigger keywords. If a client is niche then you maybe able to achieve what they want with a low amount of time.</strong></p>
<p>The returned pages amount gives you some idea but i quite often get in situations where a site will appear in the top 10 for a search which results in 10s of millions of returned pages but not for 10s of thousands of returned pages for another search. Most searches pull up noisy pages which are loosely related to the keyword and therefore easy to beat.</p>
<p>KEI and all the research in the world doesn&#8217;t mean anything until you use the force&#8230; (intuition based on SEO experience and instincts).</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57933/#msg57933" target="_blank">http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg57933/#msg57933</a></p>
<p>This is where me and <em>boogaloodude</em> start discussing what the only really way to figure out the level of competition facing each keyword and what do you actually do with that list of keywords when you&#8217;ve done all the research:</p>
<blockquote><p>The only way to fully understand the levels of competition you&#8217;re facing is to check the back links and seo work for all the top returned pages (the deeper you go the more you know!). But what were talking about are trends and reading between the lines of those trends.</p>
<p>When i do the &#8220;allin:&#8221; searches I&#8217;m not bothered about whether they match the standard searches. For example.. if we were doing research for the keyword &#8220;online dating&#8221; we&#8217;d expect to find high numbers for the &#8220;allin:&#8221; searches and we&#8217;d also expect those numbers to drop as we research the longer tailed equivalents. It&#8217;s these drops which become the metric to judge the popularity and therefore competition.</p>
<p>If I end up with a list of 800+ keywords then most of the time they can be grouped; whether this be by location or product/service etc. I&#8217;ll work through the keyword list and assign each keyword (or it&#8217;s group) to a URL/page; then ill optimise that page (and how it is linked) for those keyword(s). If I&#8217;m left with keywords which aren&#8217;t assignable then ill leave them in the bank and try and add a page for them at a later date.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg58102/#msg58102" target="_blank">http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg58102/#msg58102</a></p>
<blockquote><p>With a lot of my clients there are keywords which they want to rank for no matter what so the level of competition is something that Ill make them aware of and from there I&#8217;ll tell them how long and how much work I think it will take to accomplish top rankings.</p>
<p>But the client is interested in their big keywords and the idea of long tail never <strong>usually</strong> occurs to them. So I&#8217;ll target the ones with lowest levels of allin searches first (usually the long tail) and work up the list. As the site improves (links etc) the more competitive keywords can be targeted.</p>
<p>I figure that the allinanchor is a good indication of how many links I&#8217;m going to need, the allintitle is a good idea of how many pages I&#8217;m actually competing against (there will be pages that rank well without a direct title tag match but the title tag has so much seo weight that a direct match will usually beat most of these) and the allinurl gives me a good idea of how many pages are optimised well for the keyword, well its a clue anyway!</p>
<p>All my allin searches have &#8220;speech marks&#8221; by the way and I find certain websites will keep appearing so Ill check these out as well and check what we said about backlinks etc. And i always you the force!</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg58153/#msg58153" target="_blank">http://www.seoers.org/BB/general-search-engine-optimisation-discussion/keyword-analysis-best-method/msg58153/#msg58153</a><br />
So there&#8217;s a little insight into how i do my keyword research. How do you do it? Please feel free to check out the whole thread for some great posts by other SEOers users.</p>
<p>(my bolding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattinertia.com/keyword-research-optimisation-techniques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1365</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

